1. Since this is an individual-centered award, a critique of the award is a direct critique of me. I am curious what about my background and interests do not have “merit”?
2. If you’d like to review the data, it is fairly simple to query, but I linked it here in “long” format without investigator names.
Impressive sleuthing that leverages government accountability to connect the macro of politicizing science to the micro impact of it on your own research. And although it’s outside my domain, I look forward to these posts for inspiration as ways to fit finding a place for liberal research in my career thinking and how to write about it. Keep it up my friend.
Appreciate you! So many scientists would welcome real reform (myself included). Right now, we are getting statements and animosity instead of reform. Interested in seeing what the next few years hold. Keep up the good work!
Two important points:
1. Since this is an individual-centered award, a critique of the award is a direct critique of me. I am curious what about my background and interests do not have “merit”?
2. If you’d like to review the data, it is fairly simple to query, but I linked it here in “long” format without investigator names.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1YnPhpD76x87yvrBzx5fXk7jEocDXcOOX/view?usp=sharing
Impressive sleuthing that leverages government accountability to connect the macro of politicizing science to the micro impact of it on your own research. And although it’s outside my domain, I look forward to these posts for inspiration as ways to fit finding a place for liberal research in my career thinking and how to write about it. Keep it up my friend.
Appreciate you! So many scientists would welcome real reform (myself included). Right now, we are getting statements and animosity instead of reform. Interested in seeing what the next few years hold. Keep up the good work!